Letters to the Editor

Letters posted here are associated with the following article:
With less than a month to go, the incumbent is on the ropes.
The letters thread is now closed.
  • 'radical liberals'?

    You guys are a bunch of knuckleheads, can't find a good strategy w/ both hands. I watch the news and the only time I hear what the Dems think is when a Republican tells me. Why not start saying what the Reps are standing for: The rich getting richer! Down w/ public education b/c they don't want the competition! Skyrocketing college cost so only the wealthy will have access! Healthcare!

    30 years ago, if a Greenpeace whacko said only be drinking bottled water for $2/gallon, everyone would have called him a 'radical liberal'.

    Religeon: Bush thinks the world is 6,000 years old and NO ONE CALLS HIM ON IT!

    Energize the REALISTS in this country by discussing REAL ISSUES, not what's on Fox News today, but what people will be saying about us in 20 years: "Yup! They sure did care about gay marriages" while our jobs are outsourced and our military is ground down to a nub in a war started on a basis of lies. u r a bunch-o-knuckleheads.

  • The Trouble with Joe

    The trouble is exactly that he is indeed more of a Republican than Democrat, just like Lincoln Chafee is the opposite. It's like a transgender person before the hormone treatments...

    How much more effective these gentlemen would be if they would declare themselves properly!

    JR Rudert

  • Tell me it isn't true, Charly.

    NewsMax is running a report that Bill Clinton will campaign for Lieberman? True? RSVP!!

  • Lieberman's supporters whine

    It's interesting that Lieberman supporters blame the "far left bloggers" and Dean for the trouble the senator from CT finds himself in.

    Yeah, bury your head in the sand and continue to believe that nonsense. Lieberman is in the trouble he created for himself.

    Here are the facts. It's a representative government and when the representatives don't do their job, they get voted out. I would have voted against Feinstein in the CA primary if there had been a choice. Some of us follow how a senator votes, and Feinstein voted for the confirmation of Rice and AbuGonzales, for the war, the bankruptcy bill and the burning of the flag amendment. The Democrats in CT have a choice. I'm happy for them.

    Go Ned!