Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

8
Letters
Wednesday, July 12, 2006 12:00 AM

A strategy for victory? Not so much

The GAO says Bush's Iraq plan is built on faulty assumptions.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Wednesday, July 12, 2006 01:15 PM

This can only mean one thing...

The GAO has fallen to the terrorists too. It's incredible how such a rag-tag group of Islamic extremists, who we can't even identify, have taken over our premier newspaper, half of Congress, 60 percent or more of the general public, and who knows how much else.

Wednesday, July 12, 2006 01:16 PM

is there any justice?

I was gonna write a screed about how Bush and Cheney should both be impeached and thrown in prison.

But, I guess no screed is required. The one line covers it. If *ever* the impeachment clause in the Constitution was designed for specific acts, it was designed for the acts of this President and Vice President.

If Dems win majorities in the Congress this Fall (unlikely, I know), and they do not investigate and then impeach the President and Vice President, then they do not deserve to rule. Not now, not ever.

Wednesday, July 12, 2006 01:49 PM

Impeach them Both

Bush 'n Dick are traitors and war criminals. The flavor of the month until 2008 is im-peach-mint. I'll take a scoop.

Wednesday, July 12, 2006 02:31 PM

The Zoolander Strategy

Maybe we could start a school for president's who can't read good. Wasn't Bush warned repeatedly about all these things? Haven't both Democrats and Republicans been calling for a real plan for since the beginning of the war? Why did we have to wait four years for the GAO to write the egoogly on Iraq?

Wednesday, July 12, 2006 03:35 PM

That 2nd point needs a rewrite

"Second," the GAO continues, "the United States assumed that its U.S.-funded reconstruction activities would help restore Iraq's essential services -- oil production, electricity generation, and water treatment -- to prewar levels. However, U.S. efforts to achieve this goal have been hindered by rampant corruption on the part of the U.S. companies hired to do the work, and the Iraqi and U.S. officials working with them, in addition to the deliberate lack of planning for such projects by the architects of the invasion. This undermines efforts to improve the lives of the Iraqi people ...

Thursday, July 13, 2006 01:36 AM

The GAO says that, does the GAO?

You want to tell me who, in his or her right mind, did not already know that Bush's so-called "plan" is built on faulty assumptions? That is assuming that Bush actually has a reasonable "plan".

Bush's "plan" is to further enrich his cohorts, & the dead Iraqis & the dead American soldiers be damned. He cannot be bothered to go to the funerals of the latter, because "there is just too many of them." No Shit!

Thursday, July 13, 2006 05:16 AM

Excuse Me?

WHY don't the media call the Bush Administration on their continued use of the words "strategy for victory"? Isn't Bush the guy who stood on the deck of that aircraft carrier more than three years ago and proclaimed "Mission Accomplished"? How can we be looking FORWARD to VICTORY when our mission has already been accomplished? This is why I like Keith Olbermann... he signs off every one of his newscasts by counting the days (1,000+ now) since victory was declared in Iraq. I sure wish his fellow journalists would follow suit.

Thursday, July 13, 2006 07:01 AM

end-state

"As a result," the GAO concludes, "it is unclear how the United States will achieve its desired end-state in Iraq given these significant changes in the underlying assumptions."

We have an undesired end-state: the end of the Iraqi state. There is no way this cobbled-together country can survive in its present form.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
385

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
59

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon