This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, July 12, 2006 12:00 AM

A strategy for victory? Not so much

The GAO says Bush's Iraq plan is built on faulty assumptions.

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, July 13, 2006 05:16 AM

    Excuse Me?

    WHY don't the media call the Bush Administration on their continued use of the words "strategy for victory"? Isn't Bush the guy who stood on the deck of that aircraft carrier more than three years ago and proclaimed "Mission Accomplished"? How can we be looking FORWARD to VICTORY when our mission has already been accomplished? This is why I like Keith Olbermann... he signs off every one of his newscasts by counting the days (1,000+ now) since victory was declared in Iraq. I sure wish his fellow journalists would follow suit.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
263

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
57

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon