Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

7
Letters
Tuesday, February 21, 2006 12:00 AM

Need a job? Get the president to visit

Laid off energy workers get their jobs back just in time for a campaign stop by the commander in chief.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:41 AM

Joke: cost of 1 week of Iraq war over 5 years of 2006 NREL budget

Our country desparately needs some real commitment to alternative energy, not this smoke and mirrors 'stuff'

Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:51 AM

socities without respect disintegrate or fall prey to 'dogmas inadequate to the stormy present'abe lincoln

full quote:'the dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. the occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise with the occasion. as our case is new, so we must think anew and act anew.'abe lincoln on civil war leadership crises.

Tuesday, February 21, 2006 01:39 PM

Oh, sure.

Now every company or institution that has suffered layoffs will be vying for Bush to come and talk to them. Does this mean a bail-out for Ford and GM, too? I'm glad these people got their jobs back, but I'm not happy about the reason.

Tuesday, February 21, 2006 05:18 PM

Big Surprise

Does this surprise anyone? It's just part and parcel of this joke of an administration.

Wednesday, February 22, 2006 07:16 AM

"Transferred" the money, eh?

When they transferred the money to that lab to rehire the laid-off workers, where'd they transfer it from ? How many workers lost their jobs elsewhere so Bush wouldn't be confronted with reality?

Wednesday, February 22, 2006 07:25 AM

2001 NREL Budget Cuts

Back in 2001, the Bush administration proposed a 36% cut in NREL's funding in their budget. Steve Bunk's artical "Renewable-energy funds threatened" in Nature (411, 4-6 (31 May 2001) doi: 10.1038/35108082) has the details. Too bad Bush didn't visit back then.

Wednesday, February 22, 2006 08:45 AM

Savor the first line from this AP report on the ports deal

"President Bush was unaware of the pending sale of shipping operations at six major U.S. seaports to a state-owned business in the United Arab Emirates until the deal already had been approved by his administration, the White House said Wednesday."

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/P/PORTS_SECURITY?SITE=7219&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-02-22-10-50-29

Where to start? "President Bush was unaware..." Tell us something we DIDN'T know already. And how silly is it to call this "...his administration..."? Is there ANYONE who still believes Bush is in control of ANYTHING? If he were in control, would it be possible for such a controversial issue to proceed to final approval without involving or even INFORMING our Dear Leader?

How much more of this must occur before everyone realizes the truth -- that we have a Figurehead in Chief, not a Commander in Chief? Our President is nothing but a ventriloquist's dummy like Charlie McCarthy, except we don't know for sure who "Edgar Bergen" is -- and there's NOTHING comic about this situation.

Most Active Letters Threads

688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
647

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
322

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
209

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon