Letters posted here are associated with the following article:
The letters thread is now closed.
Well, one does not get to be chief of staff to the second-most (theoretically) powerful office in the land while sporting a faulty memory... I guess then, Scooter, you are a liar.
Does it really matter whether he remembered properly or not, given that he made manifestly untrue statements under oath? Is there actually a prosecutorial requirement to prove intent to lie in such cases?