Letters to the Editor

Letters posted here are associated with the following article:
After saying that she didn't see the "gross moral turpitude" required for a filibuster, the California senator says she'll vote against cloture on Monday.
The letters thread is now closed.
  • Contact Senators - Phone, Fax, Email

    Help support the filibuster by contacting one of the following Senators over the weekend. Remember, your voice counts.

    The Three Democrats Voting For Alito:

    Ben Nelson

    Phone: (202) 224-6551 / (402) 441-4600

    Fax: (202) 228-0012 / (402) 476-8753

    Email: http://www.senate.gov/~bennelson/contact/email.cfm

    Tim Johnson

    Phone: (202) 224-5842 / (605) 226-3440 / (605) 341-3990 / (605) 332-8896

    Fax: (202) 228-5765 / (605) 226-2439

    Email: http://www.senate.gov/~johnson/emailform.cfm

    Robert Byrd

    Phone: (202) 224-3954 / (304) 342-5855

    Fax: (202) 228-0002 / (304) 343-7144

    Email: http://byrd.senate.gov/byrd_email.html

    Our “Party Leader”:

    Harry Reid

    Phone: (202) 224-3542 / (702) 388-5020

    Fax: (202) 224-7327 / (702) 388-5030

    Email: http://reid.senate.gov/email_form.cfm

    Democrats Not Confirmed Filibuster-ers:

    Barack Obama

    Phone: (202) 224-2854 / (312) 886-3506

    Fax: (202) 228-4260 / (312) 886-3514

    Email: http://obama.senate.gov/contact/contact.cfm?cat=legal

    Mary Landrieu

    Phone: (202) 224-5824 / (504) 589-2427

    Fax: (202) 224-9735 / 504) 589-4023

    Email: http://landrieu.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm

    Ken Salazar

    Phone: (202) 224-5852 / (303) 455-7600

    Fax: (202) 228-5036 / (303) 455-8851

    Email: http://salazar.senate.gov/contact/email.cfm

    Joe Biden

    Phone: (202) 224-5042 / (302) 573-6345

    Fax: (202) 224-0139 / (302) 573-6351

    Email: http://biden.senate.gov/contact/emailjoe.cfm

    Byron Dorgan

    Phone: (202) 224-2551 / (701) 250-4618

    Fax: (202) 224-1193 / (701) 250-4484

    Email: senator@dorgan.senate.gov

    Diane Feinstein

    Phone: (202) 224-3841 / (415) 393-0707

    Fax: (202) 228-3954 / (415) 393-0710

    Email: http://feinstein.senate.gov/email.html

    Evan Bayh

    Phone: (202) 224-5623 / (317) 554-0750

    Fax: (202) 228-1377 / (317) 554-0760

    Email: http://bayh.senate.gov/LegForm.htm

    Maria Cantwell

    Phone: (202) 224-3441 / (206) 220-6400

    Fax: (202) 228-0514 / (206) 220-6404

    Email: http://cantwell.senate.gov/contact/

    Kent Conrad

    Phone: (202) 224-2043 / (701) 258-4648

    Fax: (202) 224-7776 / (701) 258-1254

    Email: http://conrad.senate.gov/webform.html

    Blanche Lincoln

    Phone: (202) 224-4843 / (501) 375-2993

    Fax: (202) 228-1371 / (501) 375-7064

    Email: http://lincoln.senate.gov/webform.html

    Mark Pryor

    Phone: (202) 224-2353 / (501) 324-6336

    Fax: (202) 228-0908 / (501) 324-5320

    Email: http://pryor.senate.gov/contact/

    Frank Lautenberg

    Phone: (202) 224-3224 / (973)-639-8700 / (856) 338-8922

    Fax: (202) 228-4054 / (973) 639-8723 / Fax: (856) 338-8936

    Email: http://lautenberg.senate.gov/webform.html?Email=Email+Senator+Lautenberg+Your+Comments+on+an+Issue

    Bob Menendez

    Phone: (202) 224-4744

    Fax: (202) 228-2197

    Email: http://www.congress.org/congressorg/mail/?id=395&type=CO&state=NJ

    Jay Rockefeller

    Phone: (202) 224-6472 / (304) 347-5372

    Fax: (202) 224-7665 / (304) 347-5371

    Email: senator@rockefeller.senate.gov

    And Sympathetic Republicans:

    Lincoln Chafee

    Phone: (202) 224-2921 / (401) 453-5294

    Fax: (202) 228-2853 / (401) 453-5085

    Email: http://chafee.senate.gov/webform_original.htm

    Susan Collins

    Phone: (202) 224-2523 / (207) 945-0417

    Fax: (202) 224-2693 / (207) 990-4604

    Email: http://collins.senate.gov/public/continue.cfm?FuseAction=ContactSenatorCollins.Email&CFID=48722893&CFTOKEN=55709294

    Olympia Snowe (The ladies may have a uterus, just not a spine.)

    Phone: (202) 224-5344 / (207) 874-0883

    Fax: (202) 224-1946 / (207) 874-7631

    Email: http://snowe.senate.gov/Webform.htm

  • I give her credit

    And I vote and live in California. I've never really gotten the whole problem with "flip-flopping". I don't respect people who stick to their guns just for the sake of doing so. I would prefer to vote for a person who is willing to take a stand, but is also willing to consider the alternatives to that position. It takes a lot more courage and brains to stand up in public and admit you were wrong than it does to stubbornly stick to your position when you find you are on the wrong side of the argument.

  • Why Have a Debate?!?

    I called Senators Boxer and Feinstein to urge them both to support a filibuster. I then asked why we're even having a public debate about issues such as abortion rights, torture, warrantless spying, equal rights, etc., when it seems our elected officials cannot even muster the political courage to use whatever tools are available to defeat such a radical, monumental appointment as this.

  • Shoulda Been A No Brainer

    Alito should have been shit-canned long ago, but the Democrats continue to play bean-bag. Why should Alito have been derailed?

    Two (2) Reasons:

    1. He's a liar. He lied to the Senate the last time he appeared before them. He promised he would recuse himself from certain cases if the Senate confirmed him. They did. He didn't keep his part of the bargain. Where I grew up we called that lying. The Democrats should have pounded him unmercifully for that.

    2. His deference to presidential power is pathological. The Framers of the Constitution, having just kicked out a King, were anxious not to create another one, and so they placed with Congress the supreme authority of the people.

    Alito virtually invented the totally bogus concept of "presidential commentary", the idea that a dissent by the president, penned as he signs legislation into law, should be given the same deference as "legislative intent" is more than just absurd. The Framers made plain that in legislative matters, Congress rules. Congress can pass a law, the president can veto it. Then Congress may, with a super-majority, override the Presidential veto and compel the President. If the President doesn't like a law and refuses to enforce it, Congress may, at its pleasure, remove the President. The president has no such power over Congress.

    Either Alito does not understand this - in which case he's too freaking stupid to be on the Supreme Court, or he DOES understand, and he is so intellectually dishonest that he can argue Presidential findings are equal to legislative intent, all the while knowing it's a lie.

    The American people could understand this argument. The Democrats were too stupid or lazy to cogently and compellingly lay it out for the public. Of course, even if they had the major media would have continued to focus on missing teens in Aruba or hijacked cruise ships, while Bush turns back the clock to 1648.

  • I was told there would be no math...

    It ain't about the math, Tim; it's about the fact that if this country stands for anything, it stands for NOT HAVING A KING. Supporting a filibuster on Alito's nomination represents the best, highest-profile means available to senators of any (or no) party affiliation of standing up against the massive, illegal, unconstitutional and bloody well unpatriotic unitary executive power grab going on in front of our very eyes. If the White House can ignore laws and deceive the other branches with impunity, the house of cards that is this delicate democracy comes crashing down in a heap - and a Supreme Court nominee who clearly supports that White House's "interpretation" of the power dynamics in American government must not be installed without a fight.

    Will the filibuster stop Alito's nomination? Of course not. That's not the point. The point is that in two or five or ten or fifty years, when people ask who stood up against this despotic attempt to pervert everything America represents, the Democratic Party must, if it is worth a damn, be able to stand up proudly and say it did everything it could, even in a losing cause.

    As for Feinstein, I'd like to think that my call yesterday, and the calls of dozens of my friends, family and other Californians, played some small part in her sudden spinal transplant - and that, my friend, is no small feat. Let us hope that the better angels of the Democrats' natures succeed in spurring them to be who they should be, who their constituents expect them to be, who their country needs them to be. Onward, friends. We ain't dead yet.