This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Friday, January 27, 2006 12:00 AM

Who's to blame for Samuel Alito?

It's easy to point fingers at Democrats who won't filibuster, but they weren't alone in getting us here.

Read other letters about this article

  • Saturday, January 28, 2006 05:57 AM

    Dems and filibusters

    Tim Grieve is correct in a general way. There is blame to go around.

    Our Senators, though, are supposed to be leaders. They should not need a huge groundswell of outrage from the minority of voters who actually pay attention.

    The Senators should have been crying Holy Hell from the minute Alito was nominated. They should have shrugged off predictable right wing complaints about the propriety of deciding how to vote prior to the hearings by pointing out that the hearings are not designed to tease the truth from right wing judicial nominees.

    The Democrats are almost 100% useless. They are not doing their constitutional duty to fight tooth and nail for their beliefs.

    Unless, of course, their "beliefs" go no further than desperately trying to hold on to their jobs.

Most Active Letters Threads

725

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
260

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
183

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon