Letters posted here are associated with the following article:

4
Letters
Monday, December 12, 2005 12:00 AM

A setback for DeLay and an embarrassment for Justice?

The Supreme Court will hear challenges to the former House majority leader's Texas redistricting plan.

The letters thread is now closed.

View:
Monday, December 12, 2005 12:54 PM

This is brilliant

"Staff attorneys will no longer be allowed to make recommendations." What a great idea. All important decisions will only be made by political appointees that way no one will ever actually have to figure out if an issue has merits or makes sense as long as it is in line with the political desires of those in charge. You just have to love this administration.

Monday, December 12, 2005 02:43 PM

Talk about a predetermined outcome

I feel a profanity laden rant coming, but I'll do my best to repress it. (I'm sure the effect the Bush administration has on my blood pressure is hastening my development of cardiovascular problems. Yet another means by which they make the health care crisis in our country worse.)

Here at Salon and in the blogosphere, I've managed to stay informed of the Bush administration's implementation of their plans by underhanded means--don't like what scientific data are telling you, defund the work that provides the data; don't like staff at the justice department offering legal opinions contrary to your intent, forbid them to comment on dubious tactics; don't like insiders making the public aware of your flawed decision-making processes, smear them--but most Americans are largely unaware of their shenanigans. With the media largely consolidated and full of co-opted, highly paid "reporters" that know which side their bread is buttered on, I despair that things like what is reported in this War Room item will ever penetrate the public conciousness.

I'm not generally a conspiracy theorist. The world is usually too big and too complex for any one person or group to entirely control what we see and hear, but we're awfully close to that state now thanks to our toothless media. Comedy is often our only outlet for speaking truth to power, e.g., the Daily Show. We seem more and more like the old Soviet Union (where humor was an important means of criticizing the communist party), only worse, because at least under that system people were mostly aware of the lies of the ruling elite. Here in the U.S. too many of us just seem stupified or can't be bothered to spend the time to figure out what's going on.

Once the system is so badly broken, how do you fix it without a revolution? I wish I had some answers as we seem to spiral further from a just and equitable society.

Monday, December 12, 2005 07:24 PM

Good news or bad?

Did the Supreme Court agree to review the Perrymandering because four justices thought there was sufficient problem with it, or because they want to overthrow the Voting Rights Act? (Remember, it isn't paranoia if they really are out to get you.)

Tuesday, December 13, 2005 08:51 AM

Just one more way to eliminate those pesky checks and balances

Who wants to listen to the help anyway, unless they're telling you what you want to hear?

This is so characteristic of the ruling party's mentality. Witness what's about to happen in Ohio regarding recounts and other election-related issues. Just make rules that say no one can challenge, disagree with, or otherwise participate in the decision making process and there you go! License to do whatever you please.

I think there's a word for this. Hold on, it'll come to me. Oh, yeah. Fascism. That's it.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
421

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
61

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon