Letters posted here are associated with the following article:
The letters thread is now closed.
A few weeks back soon after Libby was indicted, I surfed the headlines on the major TV news sites.
CNN: Libby Indicted
MSNBC: Libby Indicted
ABC News: Libby Indicted
CBS News: Libby Indicted
and FOX:
Libby Resigns
They're not even pretending anymore...
If the newspapers picked up the AP story as is, with the Republican affiliation not listed in the lead, the question then becomes "why did the AP bury it?"
It doesn't have to mean a trumpeting headline such as "Republican congressman resigns for accepting bribes." But whatever happened to referencing the political affiliation (R-CA, in this case) after the first mention of a politician's name? This information is part of the "who," which is part of the 5 W's, according to journalism 101.
Add the Minneapolis Star Tribune to the list. Their mantra of late is "We're not liberals, really we're not," which makes them the joke of liberals and conservatives alike.
From past experiences about such outrages to friends who are journalists would point out that the fact the man was a Republican wasn't really relavant to the story...
The 'story' was the dude's admissions, and quitting congress. This is actually what 'fair' reporting looks like...
Stuff and nonsense sir!
Especially in a wire story, the first reference to a US Representative always, always, always contains both party affiliation and the state represented. To wit:
"Randy 'Duke' Cunningham (R-CA) resigned from Congress today. He pled guilty to charges of bribery before a federal court two days previously." Etc etc.
In fact, party affiliation is relevant to any story about an elected official. Even if it is just a parenthetical reference like the one above, it should be included in each and every story. Omitting affiliation is like writing about a sports figure and not mentioning what team he or she plays for. It simply isn't done.
I noticed in the article written on Yahoo news, that Cunningham's affiliation was not mentioned.
I went to the internet to look it up, just because
I had a hunch. I know they would have used it if
the guy had been a democrat. Not a big deal, but
just shows how insidious the creeps are. Sharon
Heldenbrand