This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, November 17, 2005 12:00 AM

Unveiling Woodward

The revelation of a Woodward leak shouldn't hurt Fitzgerald's case against Libby, but it raises questions about Woodward himself.

Read other letters about this article

  • Friday, November 18, 2005 08:26 AM

    Good analysis misses the point

    This is a fine analysis of reality, but misses the point, which is how this messes up the prosecutor's chances of winning Libby's jury trial. Jury trials can be won on confusion, and this is a wonderful gift for the defense. Harping on minutiae such as Fitzgerald's use of the word "known" as a qualifier (who was first to leak to reporter) aren't going to mean much to a jury. Woodward twist is not a guarantee for Libby, of course, of acquittal, but it sure helps him, provided the jury does not consist of 12 reporter/bloggers.

Most Active Letters Threads

370

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
205

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
105

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
98

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
51

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon