This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, November 17, 2005 12:00 AM

Unveiling Woodward

The revelation of a Woodward leak shouldn't hurt Fitzgerald's case against Libby, but it raises questions about Woodward himself.

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, November 17, 2005 02:42 PM

    Woodward's allegiance to the Bush Administration

    Bob Woodward has every reason to put George "Gulag" Bush's interests ahead of his readers', his newspaper's and the public's interests - they feed him and make him wealthy. But, as my spouse is fond of saying - "If you lay down with pigs, you get up smelling like them." Woodward has wallowed in the Bush pen (and trough) for too long.

    If the Plame leak was an organized one, the White House agents are savvy enough to put their leaks out carefully and to let each other know to which reporters the beans have been spilled so it doesn't look like an organized attempt - imagine if Matt Cooper had the same information leaked to him by 5 different staffers. It would look like an attempt to discredit someone. Woodward is not even a reporter, as his editor admits - he's just the White House stenographer. He wasn't expected by the White House to rush out and write an article about Valerie Plame like the others were. But he could have confirmed a tip for a Walter Pincus or another reporter, if asked, because of his connections.

    There's a manure smell about the whole thing. The WP should dump Woodward and let him go take Scott McClellan's place.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
423

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
61

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon