This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, November 10, 2005 12:00 AM

What Scott McClellan said

The White House press secretary finally uttered two words of substance about the Valerie Plame case last week. The White House wants to revise them.

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, November 10, 2005 08:50 AM

    Still Playing by Their Own Rules

    Every time I think I can't be shocked by this administration's flagrant disregard for any rules but it's own, they somehow manage to up the ante. Not only does this situation seem to represent a complete disregard for the truth, but strategically it makes no sense. Why can't Scott McClellan just stand up today and say "I meant to say 'inaccurate'". People have slips of the tongue all of the time, and, sadly, we'd all forget about it by next week. Even in the video, McClellan's voice is hard to make out over a fairly insistent questioner.

    Instead, we have leadership so fundamentally unwilling to ever admit a mistake that they'll subvert the process and change the rules for even the smallest detail. Having a President willing to subvert the Democratic process to win an election, while despicable, at least revolves around stakes we can all understand. Having a President willing to subvert our most fundamental freedoms to avoid having an aide be misquoted (or quoted correctly in a mildly embarrassing light) is truly terrifying.

Most Active Letters Threads

477

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
187

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon