This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Tuesday, November 8, 2005 12:00 AM

Chemical weapons in Iraq? An old story, but new questions

Italy's state-run television network says that the U.S. used white phosphorus on human targets in Fallujah. The Pentagon has denied it.

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, November 8, 2005 08:04 AM

    Who said these were chemical weapons?

    Your headline is rather inflammatory and misleading. Who decided that white phosphorus and napalm were chemical weapons? Per Wikipedia, chemical weapons are defined as follows:

    Chemical warfare is warfare (and associated military operations) using the toxic properties of chemical substances to kill, injure or incapacitate the enemy.

    The fact that WP and napalm are chemicals does not mean that their use constitutes chemical warfare. Bullets are made of lead, and are propelled by a burning mixture of compounds. Does that mean that if US forces shoot someone, they're guilty of "chemical warfare"? White phosphorus and napalm damage human bodies by burning them, not by toxicity.

    While use of these substances may have been unwarranted, to conflate them with weapons such as nerve agents trivializes the horror of true chemical warfare, and diminishes your credibility in reporting on this issue.

    Sean Peters

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
412

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
61

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon