This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, July 26, 2007 12:00 AM

Who are you, Anonymous?

Requiring letters registration has cut down on trolls and drive-by insults, but lately we're seeing more complaints about "anonymous" writers.

Read other letters about this article

  • Friday, July 27, 2007 08:09 PM

    deep throat

    Yeah, Deep Throat is a porno flick, which many may find disgusting. Deep Throat was also a pseudonym for one of our country's most important anonymous cowards.

    Anonymity serves an important social function: anonymity allows people to speak truth to power, as they say.

    I don't think Salon needs pure anonymity, though. Salon needs pseudonymity. What you have is just right. Only registered users can post, but they can elect to hide their registered name. Salon, however, can always trace any post to its source, should the need arise. And when might that need arise? When a post falls afoul of society's legal strictures.

    Don't reinvent the law. Don't reinvent government by the people for the people. So far, as a society, we've generally managed to avoid ensconcing the vagaries of taste into law (not entirely, but that's unfortunate). Don't bow to sensitive plants in the name of page views. Sure, you'll end up with trolls and their ilk. This is nothing new. They've been online much longer than Salon, and somehow, they have failed to derail our online connect fest.

    People will continue to harangue and harass each other no matter what you do. Don't throw out a very valuable mode of communication in a futile attempt to promote civility. Civility is in the mind of the beholder; but obstructing a road to truth damages all of us.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
397

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
59

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon