Letters posted here are associated with the following article:
The letters thread is now closed.
My dear jack and jill,
"Why do you HATE this woman so much? She is like the popular girl you hated in high-school right. Time to get over it. Marie Cocco has called you out for sexist coverage. Femisex and The New Agenda have called you out for your sexism. Oh wait: Can we talk bout how fuckable Palin is again? You need some serious CBT and meds before talking about female pols."
CBT???
Joan Walsh needs some serious Cock and Ball Torture?
REALLY?
I guess you know something about Joan Walsh that I did not know.
-- something stinks
Oh, dear God, I would never say that. Is that really a thing or are you teasing me and making it up ? I was referring to cognitive behaviour therapy! that, CBT. It is a means to treat patients who ruminate excessively over things. They often have paranoia as well.
Joan, Has got to stop her bizarre fixation on women who want into power. Her site creamed Hillary in a very sexist manner and then took to the same tactics with Palin, in the MOST despicable way. I am a Huge fan and adherent of Zero Tolerance to Sexism. Joan, psst, how about channeling some energy into getting a potus run out of Susan Collins, or Olympia Snowe of Maine in 2012??
Oh, wait must destroy the women who governed Alaska as a moderate. Must destroy! Must destroy. It is getting more that a little pathological. That is the CBT i referenced.
So, what are those "real solutions" you're talking about?
Any details? Specifics?
Cuz, I've never heard a workable, effective, even rational idea come out of the John Galt movement. Nothing but irrational abstractions about "liberty" and "freedom".
Beyond that, anyone who thinks that there is a "marxist/socialist" agenda in the works from any major party in America loses all credibility.
The Dem leadership is basically centrist. Even center-right on some issues. The GOP is mainstreaming the far right.
We don't even have a progressive party in America, much less one that embraces marxism.
So, again, what are those great ideas you're talking about, Bernie?
Well, if she playing the media victim card, Joan, then as Editor-in-Chief and as a "feminist" -- how do you reconcile Salon's blatant misogyny against Sarah Palin in articles like these:
Gary Kamiya depicts Palin as a dominatrix here:
http://www.salon.com/opinion/kamiya/2008/09/09/mistress_palin/
Cintra Wilson calls Palin a fuckable Christian Stepford wife here:
http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2008/09/10/palin_feminism/index.html?source=rss&aim=/mwt/feature
Tracy Clark-Flory on the Salon "broadsheet” posts "Sneak Peek: The Palin Porno" here:
http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2008/10/20/palin_porn/index.html
Thoughts? Or are you really Salon's Missogynist-in-Chief?
Cognitive behavior therapy!?!
Personally, I'd rather have cock and ball torture.
/rimshot
A - Because her lips are moving.
Dude, seriously, this ridiculous repetition of alleged misogyny on Salon is pathetic. A) They are not examples of misogyny; at worst, they are sexist, especially if you have no sense of humor...pick up a dictionary and check for yourself. Besides, how likely do you think it is that a female writer on a site run by a female would write something truly misogynist (again, check the dictionary)? B) It is really annoying and Joan isn't going to jump because you say so. C) Your own misogyny has been pointed out to you, but you sidestepped it, like you seem to sidestep everything else when faced with your own bullshit. You are responsible for your actions and if act like a misogynist pig in this forum - ever - you must hand in your Sanctimonious Phony Protector of Women's Rights card. Seriously, check your handbook it's right there on page STFU.
How many times she mentioned Oil and Gas and National Security in her rambling appearance on Friday?
A few weeks ago Palin was in Central Texas when she slammed Letterman.
Does anyone recall this? Anyone in the media ask why she was in Central Texas- a few weeks ago?
Central Texas?
Why is no one in the msm picking this up?
In her rambling appearance on Friday- did anyone pay attention to her speech?
Some of Palin’s rambling points:
*Gatekeeper of the Nation
*Oil and Gas
*God gave us energy
*Humbling responsibility- Alaska for National Security
*No more politics as usual
*Developed responsibly to develop their resources - oil and gas
*Petroleum development office
*Drilling for Oil and Gas
*58 to 1 victory protecting Alaskans to flow to the lower 48 - pro private sector project
A few weeks ago she made her decision to quit- In a few more weeks – she will be connecting to K Street in DC or in the proximity of K Street
National Security- oil and gas!
Central Texas!
Most governors are behind Obama’s Energy Plan- 34 or 36-She was not one of them.
The train is leaving the station- enter Lobbyist Palin.
When are journalists going to look into ACORN, or something that matters instead of picking on the one woman that both really scares them and yet has no power like, oh let's say, the Obama adminsitration, to retaliate? Can we say fired Inspector General? If she's so shallow and so insignificant why do the likes of Ms. Walsh scurry to their keyboards in denunciation when it would seem less to no coverage would be deserved of such a non-entity as SP, right? Methinks the lady doth protest too much. I think the virulent anti-Palin bias, nakedly prejudicial, on the part of the likes of Ms. Walsh is best explained by a scene from Rocky IV. The liberal media elite being the steroid-infused Russian superman confronting working class Rocky Balboa with the monotone, "I must crush you." Rocky's response: "Go for it." And we all know how that one ended.
Oscar Mayer RIP! Thanks for the memories! If the Salonistas want to open a disco on this guy's grave, I have no objection! On another important topic, vaguely related website Yahoo Buzz fearlessly attacked Zack Efron's forehead-covering bangs yesterday! That took guts! In answer to the unposed question, Why does he let his hair obscure his forehead, I offer this answer: Because he can!