Letters to the Editor
This letter is associated with the following article:
-
It's part of the cycle
Well when a Malkin idea is vacuous and her world view unsubstantiated and she's lost the debate she starts making up stuff up to support her position, and when that stops working she starts making stuff up to smear individuals, and when that stops working, she complains about being a victim.
Then when those three steps stop working she changes the subject and starts at the making stuff up step.
Malkin is successful with this crap cycle because there is a large group where their "gut" tells them how the world is, they make choices based on fantasies that match their gut, rather than make gut decisions based on facts. This, come to think of it, is also a definition that fits Camille P.