John T Frazer: "I was just pointing out that Groenhagen's crucifying of Clinton is not the blow to the left that he seems to think it is."
Okay, we're in agreement then.
I was no fan of much about Bill Clinton's policy. Clinton's policy toward Iraq was one of leaving a bad situation in stasis because other sorts of action would make things worse. I don't know what he could have or should have done differently, there, though there are plenty of theories. I think it was a question of choosing one's battles. Bush chose HIS battles, and I think he chose poorly.
Another thing about the fact that Democrats voted to authorize war powers to Bush Jr.: Nobody here has mentioned that this vote was presented, by Republicans, just 3 weeks prior to the 2002 Congressional elections. This hardly excuses the Democrats' votes, and I will never forgive them for the way they handled it. But people need to remember that the vote was set up as a political ploy designed to favor the Republican interests. If the Dems voted for war, they'd give Bush the power he wanted; if the Dems voted against war, many of them would be voted out of office, further weakening what marginal power they had remaining. I think for Dems it was a roll of the dice consisting of, "Do I vote against this B.S. and lose my seat, and all the potential to do good things in the future, or do I hold my nose and hope against hopes that Bush is not a crazy warmongering bastard?"
But we forget about that...
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
219 Democrats and one Republican join in favor of the legislation, which passed by a narrow margin
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Salon headlines in your mailbox