This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, December 3, 2008 12:00 AM

The buck stops where?

Our delusional president laments the "intelligence failure" that identified nonexistent WMD in Iraq and admits he was "unprepared" for war.

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, December 4, 2008 08:14 AM

    "In Retrospect..."???

    JW: "In retrospect, though, it seems clear that he arrived in the White House surrounded by Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and other twisted neocons who were determined to topple Saddam Hussein given any excuse, or none at all."

    ==============================================================

    "In retrospect...?"

    C'mon Joan, you know better.

    Jeez--If anyone had taken the time to read the Project for a New American Century's "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century," published before the 2000 election, authored by Wolfowitz, and signed by these very same people (Rumsfeld, Cheney, Perle, Libby, et al), one would have readily seen that this group was--before even coming to power--advocating the invasion of Iraq, the overthrow of Saddam, and the building of permanent U.S. military bases in the aftermath.

    The PNAC report was there for the press, the pundits, the talking-heads, and the bloggers to see--in advance. It got virtually no attention--before or after the election. Yet, according to members of the Bush White House, the PNAC's plans for the overthrow of Saddam were discussed at the very first major White House meeting in 2001.

    Heck, the PNAC's report was merely an expanded version of this same group's open letter to Clinton in 1998 advocating the same thing. So, in reality, this group's intentions were there for the world to see for several years.

    So to say that it is only apparent "in retrospect" that this group of people would employ this particular (and devastingly disastrous) strategy is to willfully ignore the public availability of this document--a veritable blueprint for what the Bush White House would do when it came to power.

    Moreover, to say that this published plan was only apparent "in retrospect" is to willfully ignore the media's role in failing to spotlight the PNAC plan when it mattered most--before the election in 2000, and again before the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Most Active Letters Threads

437

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
408

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
332

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
108

Is my kids making me not smart?

Stay-at-home fatherhood dulls my intellect to a nub. Excuse me while I ponder the subtext of "Hippos Go Berserk"
99

I survived Glenn Beck's Christmas spectacular

The preposterous showman brings his holiday book, and waterworks, to the stage and screen. Lights! Camera! Jesus!

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon