This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, December 3, 2008 12:00 AM

The buck stops where?

Our delusional president laments the "intelligence failure" that identified nonexistent WMD in Iraq and admits he was "unprepared" for war.

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, December 4, 2008 05:06 PM

    Jim in Tucson on predicting what would happen.

    Who can forget [Rice's] famously stupid, "who could have ever predicted this would happen?" comment? ... Bush and his team utterly refuse to recognize that 9/11 was preventable ...

    Amen and hallelujah.

    But I will go a step further, even though I realize that this is beating a lonely drum in the Salon letters (and especially with Joan Walsh).

    It's not just George Bush who tells himself (as another letter writer put it) what he wishes were true, rather than what really happened. The phrase "no one could have expected nine eleven" has become generally accepted as the truth even by liberals, for reasons which are dangerous and unpleasant to consider but must be faced.

    It's the nature of authoritarian troglodytes in all societies at all times in history to want to overturn social order and replace it with a cult of naked power based on fear. People like Bush happen, they aren't mysterious or strange or shocking or unexpected — it just takes a certain basic level of wisdom to identify the threat they represent.

    A functioning liberal society establishes, and maintains, protections from people like Bush achieving power. The real problem facing the American republic is not that Bush came along or that there were people who supported him. The real problem is that, when he inevitably did, those protections failed.

    So long as otherwise well-meaning liberals are unwilling to face that fact, or grapple with the unpleasant question of why it happened, we — and our world — will remain in acute danger.

    "No one could have predicted nine eleven" is what we all say, not just Bush, in order to avoid having to face that grim fact. But Bush's failures are easy to understand and, unfortunately, beside the point.

    It's absolutely essential that we understand why we failed. And however commendable they might be, merely putting Obama in the White House, and looking critically at Bush, are not enough.

Most Active Letters Threads

685

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
612

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
317

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
209

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon