- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
I hate to rain on the Bush-bashing parade (I dislike him as much as anybody), but everybody, and I mean EVERYBODY, thought he had WMD at the time. Including his own generals, Iran, and Europe.
We can argue about whether it was right to go to war even if he had had them, but to claim that it was wrong to go to war because in fact there were no WMD is using our hindsight 20/20 vision.
Actions must be considered in the context in which they occurred. And at the time, Hussein was actively trying to convince us that he might, could, probably did have WMD. Without actually having them. Because any proof of their actual existence would justify an attack on his country. And unluckily for him, people believed that he did.
So yeah, Bush is right to say that he wishes the intelligence had been better. I wish it had been better too. We might not have invaded if we'd known, for certain, that he didn't.
I bring this up because it bothers me when people try to rewrite history to justify their current opinions. It's important to remember what actually happened, not just what we wish actually happened.
