This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, December 3, 2008 12:00 AM

The buck stops where?

Our delusional president laments the "intelligence failure" that identified nonexistent WMD in Iraq and admits he was "unprepared" for war.

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, December 3, 2008 04:49 PM

    Saddam Was Attacked Because The Bush Gang Knew He Lacked a WMD Arsenal...

    They knew the inspectors had discovered the puported WMDs did not exist but by knowing this it guaranteed they would attack Iraq believing it would be "a cake walk slamdunk." W. Bush had long dreamed of the day when he would finish what his dad failed to do in 1991: topple Saddam's regime. He mentioned this to a biographer while governor of Texas. Mr. Dearlove of Britain's MI5 disclosed this agenda in the "Downing Street Memo." Later others such as Spanish Prime Minister Azera also wrote of this. We have seen politicians on both sides of the aisle make the excuse that the intelligence was faulty as their reasons for supporting the invasion. However, common sense should have prevailed when comparing such a policy to the one used against North Korea a nation which had a WMD arsenal at the ready. This proved to the world that the best guarantee that you will not be threatened or intimidated by nations possessing nukes if you also create a nuclear retaliatory capability. Daniel Ellsberg many years ago counted twenty-six threats by American poliiticians to use nukes. (Always against nations not having them.) France was insulted by correctly rejecting being drawn into the quicksand of the Mideast by writers such as George Will saying "How many divisions are needed to defend Paris?" Answer: "We do not know because it was never done!!" Mr. Will is no W. Bush as he does read history and knows the millions of soldiers France lost in their wars against Germany. Steve, World War 2

Most Active Letters Threads

690

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
324

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
209

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon