Letters to the Editor
-
Joan, they're setting her up for another fall.
Dear Joan, Hillary can't win for losing. She does what they want, they criticize her. She does what is right, they criticize her. Now that she isn't in thier political way, the pundits are praising her like she's the next best thing to sliced bread. Some are even being kind; the same people that have been so cruel I stopped watching thier shows. The division in the democratic party was created by the pundits and the biased media outlets pretending to be objective. Terry McCaullife said, "congradulations on your win," to John King at the concession speech today. And John King just smiled. That is what created the wedge between the Obama campaign and the Clinton campaign. The marked unfairness of the coverage and the double standards. Nothing Obama does is going to make that open sore heal for a percentage of Clinton supporters. We're so angry, we're drunk with it. So every time I hear sweet words for Hillary come out of an Obamabot "news" person or "Democratic (read Obama supporter)Strategist", I feel rage at the hypocrisy. This is the "Change" we've all been waiting for? Sounds like more of the same to me. Iron my Shirts, indeed. With the race in November so close, what kind of percentage of outraged Clinton supporters would it take to put McCain over the top? Obamabots have already said if Obama loses in November it will be Clinton's fault. Obama is so fey, and is such a pawn to history, that Hillary Clinton's very existance has the ability to lose a general election for him. Ignore his shady associates, his lack of experience, his "sweetie", "bittergate", "typical white person" remarks. After all, the superdelegates have. Ignore that whole MI/FL fiasco of giving Obama 59 delegates he didn't earn and taking 4 from Clinton, because he probably won't carry those states anyway. In the end, it will be Hillary Clinton's fault. Sincerely, Woman Scorned.