This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, April 16, 2008 12:00 AM

Don't blame San Francisco for Obama's "Bittergate"

Candidates pander to wealthy donors in every city, not just mine!

Read other letters about this article

  • Friday, April 18, 2008 08:42 AM

    Pandering? What pandering?

    The only thing that was ill-advised about Obama's words was the response of those unwilling to explore the meaning of those words. If Obama was pandering at all, he was pandering to those willing to engage in a thoughtful reflection about the state of political -- well -- pandering!

    "Hmm," he might have been saying. "How do we talk about the ways in which government and citizens can work together to create hope and opportunity with all of this pandering to hot button issues?"

    The crowd ponders for a moment and then they all say in unison: "Just kidding! Who would want to talk about opportunity and hope when we can slam each other over word choice?"

Most Active Letters Threads

677

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
439

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
227

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
225

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon