This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, April 16, 2008 12:00 AM

Don't blame San Francisco for Obama's "Bittergate"

Candidates pander to wealthy donors in every city, not just mine!

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, April 17, 2008 12:54 PM

    Alternatives to Salon?

    There are columnists I disagree with much of the time (Traister), and columnists I agree with much of the time (Greenwald), but the fact that they remain thoughtful and intellectually honest writers keeps me coming back.

    But I've begun to realize that Joan Walsh rubs me the wrong way much of the time, and reason isn't because I tend to disagree with her, but because I find her frequently intellectually dishonest. This article about Obama's "gaffe" was a prime example; anyone who reads his comments in context, in their entirety, cannot honestly believe that they were "patronizing" or delivered as a form of condescension. That they've been read that way by much of the mainstream media is an indictment of the idiocy that passes for reporting and commentary in that sphere these days, but I look for more from Salon, and for Ms. Walsh to jump on that weak bandwagon so enthusiastically has seriously tainted my longtime respect for this publication.

    I've noted other letter-writers in this thread who appear to agree with me, and a number of them have indicated that Salon is no longer their first choice for alternative news and commentary.

    My question (for everybody) is: where do you go first now for the kind of intellectually honest commentary that used to be Salon's hallmark? I'm looking for a new first choice...

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
385

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
59

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon