This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, April 16, 2008 12:00 AM

Don't blame San Francisco for Obama's "Bittergate"

Candidates pander to wealthy donors in every city, not just mine!

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, April 15, 2008 10:21 PM

    To Joan

    I'm still thinking, but:

    For the sake of discussion let's say that you are spot on, that there are more awful obama supporters than Hillary ones. Let's even just take it for granted that that the awful Obama supporters are awful in the way you describe; they are smug, elitist and really look down on anybody who doesn't agree with them. Taking that, for now, as a proven fact:

    Even if Obama has a higher percentage of awful supporters than the average presidential candidate, how much does that inform us about the nature of the man (in this case) himself? And how much does that inform us about the effect his policies will have on the health care system, on foreign policy, on new economic steps, on education, on race, sex and other issues? If we assume that Obama has 8% more awful supporters than most presidential candidates, based on that, how much do we know about the reasons we should or should not vote for him?

    I've guessed before that you focus on this fact because you are concerned solely with strategy, that you simply are trying to figure out how perception will affect the democratic nominee. This is partly why I think if Hillary was in the lead you would be seriously concerned with how she is perceived. It would help me so much if I knew that you really were coming form this basic strategic question because then I would not get agitated by why I perceive as an odd over-focus on how Obama can be percieved negatively.

    But I also have to give you credit: there is no way that you are only thinking strategically. Your concern about the higher percentage of awful Obama supporters (let's say 9% higher) must also be connected with ideas you have about what this actually means about his potential presidency. I really want to know your thoughts about this. I also want to know your strategy thoughts, but that leads to questions about Hillary's downside as well and I'm not all that interested in spending much more time talking about negative Hillary perception. I think there is a useful conversation to be had about what the higher percentage of negative Obama supporters says about the affects he will have on our country if he is the person walking off of Air Force One.

Most Active Letters Threads

683

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
506

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
303

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon