Letters to the Editor

This letter is associated with the following article:
The candidate's Pennsylvania remarks, and his passionate defense of them, are more convincing than the debate about them would have you believe.
  • lumidense

    If Barack had been involved in national politics as long as Hillary has, and some new younger woman with just 3 years in the Senate were running against him for President, and he had worked with McCain on national defense the way Hillary has, he might have made a similar comment.

    You still have not answered my question about how you interpreted Hillary praising McCain who is really really a Republican. Instead you give me your spin on a wole lot of ifs.

    You accuse me of not being critical about Obama and here you are defending the most indefensible. It is OK for Hillary to praise McCain at the detriment of her own party; it is ok for Hillary to resort to dirty Rovian attack ads; it is ok for Hillary to support NAFTA and then not support it but her husband makes a shitload of money off of the Columbia influence peddling; it is ok for Hillary to lie about her foreign policy experience. If you are indeed a person who values integrity then these Hillary lies should be a cause of much concern for you. And she did vote for the war on Iraq.