Letters to the Editor
-
@jebldmm
But if you look with open eyes at the evidence, I think that you will see that most of the unfair attacks came from Obama's camp. He has been portraying Clinton as a racist, selfish, destructive candidate for many months. He started the attacks with the "Senator from Punjab" jabs and hasn't actually stopped, although he uses surrogates (often high level ones) for many of the attacks. Clinton has attacked, but generally on issues, competence, experience, not "character". Now, he implies that she "forced" him to get nasty (poor, baby) and that Clinton should drop out of the race (until he finally said otherwise, it was standard thought). Obama could have ended the "race" charges against Clinton anytime he wanted, but he chose not to. He chose to benefit from the race issue the same way he chose to benefit from association with a church whose pastor doesn't believe in America and he chose to benefit from association with Rezko. He's not a victim. He made his choices. Clinton made hers. He chose to win by attacking the character of his opponent. She chose to try to win by attacking the experience of her opponent.
Wow. Just...wow. This is the most insane projection I've seen in ages. Happy Opposite Day. Plus as an added bonus we get a liberal sprinkling of some good old Fox News bold-faced, straight-up lies.
Your very last sentence is the only correct statement you've made in your entire batshit rant.
I'm sorry you have decided to leave the Reality-Based Community. Good luck out there, and try not to choke on your own bile.