Letters to the Editor

This letter is associated with the following article:
A New York magazine piece says the Democratic front-runner turned off the populist Edwards by attacking Clinton's health plan and seeming "glib and aloof."
  • Assyrian

    "This blog post could just as easily have been titled "Why John Edwards hasn't endorsed Clinton," but of course, it isn't, because it's written by Joan Walsh."

    No. No it couldn't. The bit was about what Obama did wrong given an obvious positive. In fact, the presupposition is that Edwards WANTED Obama from the get go, and that a face-to-face meeting dissueded him on personal grounds. Given your logic the article could have been title "Why Edwards hasn't endorsed Lyndon LaRouche" and gone on about how Edwards read the a LaRouche pamphet he found on the floor of a train and found it moronic.

    Your endorsement of your candidate (and mine by the way) approaches vapid hyperbole and even conspiracy theory hysteria.