Letters to the Editor
-
@Jameka ..learn your name-calling from Joan?
That's about all she and people like you are good for ... when you don't have the facts, call people names. Walsh has not been criticized for "not genuflecting to Obama" as you wrongly say, but she has been criticized on very specific matters - all of which can be proven or disproven by comparing these specific criticisms with her posts. As has been pointed out by many, and nor refuted by Ms. Walsh (that should tell you a lot) EVERY post she has written contains implied or direct criticism of Obama either by her or surrogates while going to extremes to excuse everything Hillary; every topic she chooses to write about or not (Wright numerous times, Bosnia lie not at all) seems to be based on its negative impact toward Obama. The worst thing about this is the deception she is spinning that she is somehow impartial - just admit her bias for all to see and then say OK, I'm for Hillary but I want Salon's coverage to be fair overall. Instead she puts on this false mask of impartiality; gets on CNN and lies about Salon's (non) coverage of the Hillary Bosnia lie, and makes every post seem like it was written by a Clinton team member posing as a journalist.