Read other letters about this article
As always, Camille's broad, sweeping style is invigorating, yet ultimately unsatisfying. Her style is overly broad and surface-level, full of grandiose declarations but dodging the pesky burdens of deep, substantial thought. I like her contrarian viewpoints, even when I don't agree with them. I just wish she could be bothered to delve below the surface every now and then.
I love this Molly Ivins article from 1991 critiquing Camille's style:
http://www.its.caltech.edu/~erich/misc/ivins_on_paglia
Kind of says it all!