Letters to the Editor

This letter is associated with the following article:
Are Clinton's inept attack ads and faux-feminism enough? Can Obama learn to attack? Plus: American eroticism devolves to Barbie boobs and Botox.
  • Why rush?

    "But hasn't Rush's massive appeal always been based on his adherence to core principles rather than to narrow partnership?" What on earth are those special core principles you're referring to? I've never understood your appreciation of this douche-bag. Camille, as a fan of yours, if your reading this, please try to better explain what about him you find appealing.