Letters to the Editor
-
@AnaHadWolves regarding "The Audacity of Hype"
Let me fix your "Audacity of Hype" message and see how you like it when it's turned around? Ready?
The Audacity of Hillary-Suckups
If you examine the agenda, biases and bases of female Democrats who are voting for and speaking for Hillary Clinton so vehemently, I'd posit that the majority of them base their support mostly on gender. Whether or not they'll admit to that is another thing entirely. (And, yes, I know; by even bringing up the issue of gender-based voting, I'll be immediately pilloried as a "sexist"; such is the fate of anyone who dares to question Hillary's big coronation. )
However, when the majority of female votes go to Hillary in several states, where the majority of Democrats are female, you can't tell me that the overwhelming majority of them didn't chose Hillary solely because she is one of them. It's that simple; "she's one of us" was the primary reason for their vote. Competence/experience be damned.
You can perorate, bloviate, pontificate and remonstrate all you wish, the simple truth is that Hillary's support is, for the most part, sexually-based. A few liberal males and latinos notwithstanding, should she be the Democratic nominee, she will lose to McCain and the Democrats will self-flagellate...again...and wonder why they lost.
All the result of the audacity of the Hillary suck-ups...