Dems are caving in on equity stake? Am I missing something?
From Obama's 9/21 remarks on the Paulson Plan:
http://www.barackobama.com/2008/09/21/a_statement_of_principles_for.php
Taxpayers should be protected. This should not be a handout to Wall Street. It should be structured in a way that maximizes the ability of taxpayers to recoup their investment. Going forward, we need to make sure that the institutions that benefit from financial insurance also bear the cost of that insurance.
Not very specific, but it sounds like he wants a taxpayer equity stake in the bailed-out firms.
And from TMP, a copy of the current Dem counter proposal:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/docs/working-draft-house-bailout-plan/
Maximizing Taxpayer Benefits. Makes clear that (1) Treasury must obtain warrants (or similar assets) if they engage in a direct purchase from a company; (2) must remit profits back to the general fund; and (3) the Secretary consider the institution's heath before making the plan so not to artificially prop-up companies that will fail anyway.
They have abandoned the above?
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
The Maine fight was supposed to be the dress rehearsal for repealing California's Prop. 8 -- but gay marriage lost
Once one obtains Seriousness credentials in the Washington media, they are irrevocable no matter one's conduct.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
Salon headlines in your mailbox