This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Friday, August 8, 2008 12:00 AM

Salon Radio: Anthrax edition

Two experts -- one in bioweapons and one in journalism -- explore the numerous, still unanswered questions in the anthrax case.
Glenn Greenwald

Read other letters about this article

  • Friday, August 8, 2008 12:14 PM

    LWM

    Can you give us a brief summary of Prof. Chomsky's take on this, or the interview in general? Just a few hints, perhaps?

    I didn't talk to him about the anthrax case. That was on my list, but I didn't get to it.

    He did say he wants Obama to win, thinks that's important, even though (obviously) he's no fan of Obama.

    It was a really good interview, in my view, and it was close to homicide-inducing that it was lost (nobody's fault - purely technical). But I'm sure he'll do it again shortly.

    —GlennGreenwald Read GlennGreenwald's other letters

    Flag
Read other letters about this article

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
Glenn Greenwald Read article
371

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
Glenn Greenwald Read article
347

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
Glenn Greenwald Read article
278

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
Alex Koppelman Read article
211

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself
Joan Walsh Read article

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon