No lies. Where I was is immediately searchable and will generate a list of names.

Really? I've just Googled, "Where was ondelette on 9/11?" and it directed me right back to Salon!

The person I brought up, and obviously shouldn't have, given your lack of internet etiquette and malicious prying, would be identifiable within minutes.

Perhaps you should have thought about that yourself then before trying to make a statement that you had no intention of verifying then shouldn't you? And if you are not going to verify it you should withdraw it. Your original statement cannot stand unless verified.

That ain't gonna happen so get over yourself.

There is a big problem here. If, what you have said about it all being searchable the information would therefore already be in the public domain. And I wouldn't have thought being a NIST engineer was in anyway illegal. Nor to be a NIST engineer being found to be crying in a New York street on 9/11. In fact quite the contrary. I'd have thought it obligatory to cry in a street in New York on that day and a crime not to be seen doing so. So no one needs protecting here anyway.

So shut the fuck up with all your twaddle and tell me where you were on 9/11. Every time you open your big fat mouth you stick your big fat foot further down your cake hole making yourself look even more ridiculous than did before.

"You've been told that the information you are asking for is private,"

Oh have i? So what's this then?

"Where I was is immediately searchable and will generate a list of names. Those in turn are immediately searchable to determine other information about those people."

Private, searchable, searchable, private! In the one post it totally contradicts itself! Here is one it did earlier:

A theorem is something that's been proven true. Which means it was always true, but we now know it was always true, because we've discovered the proof

I could knock you around the court morning noon and night. Do you play squash do you? Ever we meet we will have to have a match. But I'll be using your fucking head rather than a ball. It would be so much more fun.

this dip stick ondelette thinks you can take the term "Crimes against Humanity" which has a clearly understood meaning and turn it into, "Humanity against crime" which has absolutely no meaning whatsoever.

Keep digging. You're proving what I said about your prying and hounding over and over again. You don't know enough logical thinking to string two thoughts together end on, so don't expect to figure it out. And you're not smart enough to see when you've soiled your own shorts in your efforts to insult and deride people. No, I won't "shut the fuck up". You're an idiot, you've proven that very clearly over the past few days. And you're stalking for information you were told was private. That breaks the rules, and discredits you on the internet as someone who cannot be trusted. Ever.

And you're stalking for information you were told was private.

If this information was so private why then did you mention seeing some NIST engineers break down and cry in New York City on 9/11 in the first place?

It's obvious from you're behavior I shouldn't have. I was trying to clue you in to the reality of what people from NIST are like. I had no idea you were as stupid as you are, nor as persistent and malicious. So you're right. I should never have brought it up in a discussion with an identity hacker asshole who doesn't follow the rules of internet propriety. You have no credibility left on the internet. You don't know how to be decent amongst the virtual public. You're just a privacy threat. Like a worm.

Current Salon headline:

Michael Jackson Doctor Went Too Far

I was trying to clue you in to the reality of what people from NIST are like.

And grateful as I was I asked for further details. I did not ask for their names as you very well know. Nor do I wish to know their names. But what I do wish to know is what fucking street were you on at the time when you saw this happen? And your failure to answer that shows you to be a liar all along. And the fact that you are a LIAR is further confirmed by you saying that that information is both private yet mysteriously searchable at one and the same time.

So you prove the old old story true don't you? You start of telling the first lie you then when questioned have to back it up with more lies and more you are questioned the more preposterous and ridiculous your lies become.

The jigs up sonny. You have been exposed for the utter fraud you were all along.

You were told the truth. You handled it quite badly, and ignored the rules. You continue to ignore the rules. You're, like I said, a human equivalent to a worm, a virus, or a phishing program. Someone who attempts to extract information that is not freely given. I told you there is a privacy concern, you ignore that and call me a liar, insult me, hound me, and demand the information I told you wasn't to be forthcoming because of privacy. Every time you continue to demand it, you deepen the credibility hole you are digging for yourself.

I was somewhere that keeps public records. If I tell you where that was, then the rest is open to everyone who reads my answer in a few quick searches. How explicitly does that have to be stated to you before you understand? Even someone who obviously flunked every math course after 8th grade can probably understand that, but not you. So, in addition to being a privacy risk, you're apparently stupid.

Why don't you cut your losses? You aren't convincing anyone that I am lying, because I am not, and you aren't convincing anyone that you know physics, because you don't, and you aren't convincing anyone that I don't know anything about theorems, because I do. And you aren't going to get information that is neither your business, nor, at this point, something you've shown you can handle in an ethical manner. I have reasons why I'd prefer to be identified only by my handle, I have reasons why I'd prefer you didn't know who my acquaintances are by name, and I don't choose to compromise that on your insistence. You're a stalker and a risk:

LondonLad is an internet risk, and should be shunned by everyone out here. Unless and until he learns to respect the privacy of others, he should be persona non grata to all who value their privacy. He doesn't play by the rules and doesn't care who or what he would injure for his own purposes. Correspond with him at your own risk. He's a human internet worm.