Squalene in vaccines has been strongly linked to the Gulf War Syndrome. On August 1991, Anthony Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs admitted that soldiers vaccinated with the anthrax vaccine from 1990 to 1991 had an increased risk of 200 percent in developing the deadly disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also called Lou Gehrig’s disease. The soldiers also suffered from a number of debilitating and life-shortening diseases, such as polyarteritis nodosa, multiple sclerosis (MS), lupus, transverse myelitis (a neurological disorder caused by inflammation of the spinal cord), endocarditis (inflammation of the heart’s inner lining), optic neuritis with blindness and glomerulonephritis (a type of kidney disease).

The second ingredient, and one that greatly concerns me, is called gp120, a glycoprotein. Researchers found when it was mixed with squalene, the glycoprotein became strongly antigenic—that is, it produced a powerful and prolonged immune response to the vaccination. In fact, their studies show that with each dose, the intense immune reaction lasts over a year.

Now for the shocker—the glycoprotein-gp120, a major component of MF-59 vaccine adjuvant, is the same protein fragment isolated from the HIV virus that is responsible for the rapid dementia seen in AIDS patients.

Studies have shown that when gp120 is taken up by the microglia cells in the brain, it causes intense inflammation and makes the brain subject to excitotoxic damage—a process called immunoexcitotoxicity. This is also the cause of the MS and optic neuritis associated with vaccines that contain MF-59.

So, how would the gp120 get into the brain? Studies of other immune adjuvants using careful tracer techniques have shown that they routinely enter the brain following vaccination. What most people do not know, even the doctors who recommend the vaccines, is that most such studies by pharmaceutical companies observe the patients for only one to two weeks following vaccination—these types of reactions may take months or even years to manifest.

It is obvious that the vaccine manufacturers stand to make billions of dollars in profits from this WHO/government-promoted pandemic. Novartis, the maker of the new pandemic vaccine, recently announced that they would not give free vaccines to impoverished nations—everybody pays.

One must keep in mind that once the vaccine is injected, there is little you can do to protect yourself—at least by conventional medicine. It will mean a lifetime of crippling illness and early death.

True if they have a similar agenda or objectives.

Absolutely not if the agendas of the diverse groups are irreconciliable, particularly if one group thinks it has the upper hand.

You can "see how easy" it is to come up with a common definition to the Afghanistan "situation" here when we have competing irreconciliable perceptions by different posters. If we cannot even characterize the situation that needs to be addressed how can a good solution be found?

From a perception that Nato is doing good deeds so we should continue until all the goodness is done, to the opinion that we should "get the criminals out of there" as soon as possible and allow the Afghans to resolve their problems, to the opinions that are anything in between, how can we find common ground?

I think it is more difficult than to find an honest politician.

Fascist plutocracy must die, for it has given us Bush's and Cheney's treason, and imposed the welfare fascism of the Wall Street Bailout to shore up the unconstitutional Fed JFK's EO11,110 attempted to remove.

Whig America, Land of the Free and Home of the Brave, must destroy Tory traitors again: it's in the DNA of all who would be true Americans. "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure." LIfe is a jungle: weeds must be pulled out by the root; families and rackets are smarter than wolves and weeds.

Learn and know The Creed. Nothing could be more simple...the three Mottoes on the Great Seal.

No king, no pope, only "Annuit Coeptis" and the sovereignty of the Individual, for "E Pluribus Unum," all. This is the New Secular Order. The King of America "reigns in heaven above."

The People rule in Truth and Justice, alone.

Try, convict and execute the traitors Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rove, Rice and all we can know had proven roles in the 9/11 treason, and a hundred, or a thousand of the closest provable operatives and mechanics.

The corporate structures forfeited, found to have been instrumental in the treason.

Rome's "Fifth Column" extirpated. More marginal traitors marked and banished.

Their treason is manifest. Justice must be established.

Next to our hundreds of millions is the satanic opposition of tens of thousands whose hangers-on will drop away once treason's blood is shed by Rule of Law.

LIve Free or Die

Maotsetung, the CEO of Baxter belongs to a Republican group that used to be called 'Keep Our Majority', when they still had one and is now called 'Keep Our Message' or something totalitarian like that. This group is based in Virginia I believe and includes Dennis Hastert and the usual suspects.

This is hilarious. You give me three questions, I tell you I can answer one of them without identifying people, and answer it. You respond,

Now why am I still waiting for the answers to the other two questions?

I'm also waiting for you to retract the statement byou made about me ever asking for names which I of course did not.

So, I still want two more answers and one retraction.

You demand the answers to the questions that will identify people and so weren't answered. Then you demand a retraction of my claim that you try to force me to identify people!

Obviously, no retraction is necessary and those questions will never be answered. And you are a jerk for asking them.

Two points:

1) Correct language is not had by google votes. The term is dynamical systems. If you don't like it, don't use it. People who study dynamical systems will take note.

2) You, in fact, did assert that you'd looked over fractals and decided it wasn't of any use. In fact, you burst on the scene claiming exactly that dynamical systems (it was you who brought up fractals) and chaos and complexity were of no use studying social/political systems. Now you say that you had no intention of conveying that precious piece of wisdom. Well, thanks, I guess. I will assume you do believe that someone could find them useful. In any case, I won't stop using them, and, if they're appropriate to bring up in the future, won't refrain from bringing them up. In short, your whole long attempt to stifle me by impressing the world with your mathematical knowledge does not stand. Although I'm sure at least one person was impressed with your math -- you.