"In a nutshell," "our political class" is a buffer-caste for that ruling false-elite which has ordered, condoned, or profited from assassinations of our leaders, false war, defilement of our money, illegal immigration and treason against the Constitution and the sovereign People.

Obama may be an anointed anomaly.

The People, obedient to the three Mottoes of the Creed, must shield him by becoming the source of the impetus for G-d's vengeance upon the easily traceable Roman Anti-Christ (verbatim Thomas Jefferson) in Our Land.

It is We who must "cast the Beast into the PIt." Those who disagree are servile, ignorant, or accomplices to Treason.

Prosecution for Torture is a "string" pulled which can ultimately snap Bush's and Cheney's necks at the Navy Yard. Their corporate, clan, and institutional sponsors shall then be fully expropriated, and constitutional money restored.

its quiz time. Where did you ever here or read thinking like this before?

The reason I said there was no invasion of Afghanistan is because that's what the facts say. Invasions require troops, those troops invade. It didn't happen.

Come on now truthers you are supposed to know all about your 9's and your 11's.

Got it?

It was from the WTC7 report wasn't it? Remember old Dr Sham the man Saunders having us on saying they knew conclusively the building couldn't have been dropped by explosives because there there wasn't the sound of a loud explosion that could be heard up to half a mile away? No loud explosion, no bomb, sorted. No troops , so no invasion, sorted, say no more, a nods as good as a wink to a blind horse and Eric Idle.

It was all an attempt to attack my credibility

No need to you do it all by yourself. Now once again from the top - substantiate or retract the following:

Saturday, July 11, 2009 05:36 PM

"LondonLad ran me all over tarnation trying to get me to name names at government agencies.."

troofer theories of physics,

No such thing. We use Newton.

Those "incapable" of understanding America's Founders' "Whig Interpretation of HIstory" are victims of Loyola's perversion and oppression.

Bush's father killed John Kennedy, with his Hitler-financing, Knight of Malta-father's protégé, Nixon and a team from the Knight of Malta-led, Roman Catholic CIA, to restore the Vatican's correspondent bankers to control of our money ("reversing" Executive Order 11,110), six weeks after NSAM263 had ordered our military's withdrawal from the papal fiefdom of Vietnam, where the 5% Roman Catholic false-elite owned 95% of the little country's wealth.

Prescott Bush began funneling money from the Roman Catholic collection plates in America, through Vatican banker Rockefeller's Chase Manhattan coffers, as soon as the Roman Catholic Bishops at Fulda removed their proscription against voting for the Nazi Party. That bank is now the Iraqi State Bank and the Bushes have been fronting for the Rockefellers since, what is now Roman Catholic, Big Oil was built on unredressed murder and arson in 1870's Cleveland, Ohio (read Tarbell's First Edition, before she was bought off).

The sedulous proof is David Ray Griffin's "The New Pearl Harbor." None with intelligence and integrity can deny "the math."

I told you that supplying the information you insisted I supply would identify people and would hurt people (emotionally, no big secret plot). You persisted in your demands, and even amplified them. You hounded. You used it as a weapon whenever your arguments got backed into a corner. You actually continue to insist that I was not telling the truth and demand the information I originally told you I wouldn't supply. Consider my comment substantiated. Not that it will change things. Your display of mental abilities over the 'theorem' definition shows what an uphill battle it is for you to understand anything. What amazes me is how bernbart can collect such a rash for her comments while you slip off scot free.

You have no idea what any one here knows or does not know. That is true for me about you, or for you about me. So your comments are totally out of line. I have not questioned your knowledge about dynamic systems. What I question is the relevance to the topics at hand. You keep attacking me and other people's knowledge.

I was playing with Mandelbrot fractals very early in its life. However, after some time me and other people interested in the topic decided that the thing they were best for was to generate incredible colorfull graphics, so we have "competitions" to see who could create a function that resulted in the most dramatic graphics. That was fun but it did not help anybody's marks.

Planar geometry is not a synonym for Euclidean Geometry, which you obviously understand but are incapable of acknowleging because it reflects poorly on your precission. So, you can go and do an unnatural act on yourself. You may even like it.

To the smart ass that refers to my poor spelling, it my surprise you that English is not my first language and I did not have a spell checker available when I wrote the post.

The spelling Gestapo consistently shows around to enlighten discussions. They normally suffer from a serious case of mental constipation.

With regard to Afghanistan, what the US is doing there is simply criminal. That includes the participation of Canada too (my country of residence).

By the way, to understand the human impact of the subject under discussion you only have to know how to count to 2000.

Also understand the complicated concept that that represents more than 60% of the people that died 9/11.

Reference to license fees was in response to ondolette condescending attitude about other people's mathematical knowledge.

If you think that Corporate America is willing to pay significant license fees, particularly to a non-national for some ideas coming from some ignoramus, think again. The money is business, the algorithms are knowledge. I created them; they are not somebody else's work that I sell.

Is there a crime using your formal training to make a business?

I did not think mathematical knowledge and business were mutually exclusive.

One of the unfortunate, but topical to current affairs, is that our main customers are large financial institutions. Please, do not think that I have anything to do with the insane risk assesment computations used to bring about this financial catastrophe (supposedly the result of advanced mathematics with some flavour of "Monte Carlo" simulation both in the mathematical sense and in the casino sense). They were created by mathematicians that lacked any common sense. Need I say more?