This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, January 12, 2009 12:00 AM

Obama v. the National Intelligence Estimate on Iran

Last year, the NIE famously concluded with "high confidence" that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003. Why did Obama say yesterday that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons?

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, January 12, 2009 08:25 AM

    So what Obama has to deal with is....

    a. Iran with a stopped nuclear weapons program; but

    b. with good likelihood of achieving enough highly-enriched uranium for a weapon in the next six years, with a small likelihood of achieving this by end of 2009; and

    c. just a political decision away from restarting what appears to be a long-term strategic objective of acquiring nuclear weapons; yet

    d. perhaps susceptible to some mixture of pressure and reward to abandon the weapons program permanently.

    The problem for the American President is to induce Iran to abandon permanently its weapons program. The problem is very much there. Obama's words yesterday certainly do not exhibit the NIE understanding of the Iranian nukes problem.

Most Active Letters Threads

360

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
190

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
93

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
47

Have yourself a very merry black Friday

The author of "Scroogenomics" explains why holiday shopping is a drain on the wallet and the holiday spirit
46

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon