This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, January 12, 2009 12:00 AM

Obama v. the National Intelligence Estimate on Iran

Last year, the NIE famously concluded with "high confidence" that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003. Why did Obama say yesterday that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons?

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, January 12, 2009 03:16 PM

    By only looking forward and not looking back the tendency is to walk in circles.

    Iran-Contra prosecutions could have prevented Iraq war crimes by letting those involved know there will be consequences.

    What happened...did they threaten the Oabam girl's lives?

    How can Obama, just out of the blue, start turning into a Bush/Pelosi clone. Prosecuting Bush will interfere with "policy making"?

    We vote for one person and another shows up for work. It's like listening to Bush being forced by congress to justify his Iran policies. From all sources there is no evidence of Iran seeking a nuclear weapon...nor would a nuclear Iran be anymore threatening than a nuclear Israel or Pakistan or India is.

    Who has Obama been talking to...or listening to? Has he just got his "marching" orders from the 'shadow' government or what?

    In '06 dems were overwhelmingly elected with a mandate to accomplish 2 things...1)end the Iraq war; 2)end the government corruption of the Bush administration. They did neither...didn't even try. They did just the opposite...legalizing Bush's corruption while giving him everything he demanded from them. They boast of an increase of a (non-livable) minimum wage as their biggest accomplishment.

    After our elected officials take office they disconnect with the people who elected them. It is no Democracy when the people are unable to control the actions of their elected government...a government supposedly of, by and for the people.

    Obama had no good explanation for voting for telecom immunity. He has no good explanation for saying he may not be able to close Gitmo...and certainly no good reason to let the Bush administration get away with breaking the law.

    Bush comes from the position of being a self serving selfish, egotistical spoiled brat asshole...Obama is none of those things so there is every reason to believe he will be more open ans sensitive to the will of the people with intentions of doing the right and Just thing. Perhaps (like FDR) he wants our voices to be loud and clear("...now make me do it").

    Iran once offered its help and total cooperation, even offering to end it's nuclear program without complete oversight...but it was ignored and hidden by Condi Rice. If we treat them differently they will respond. They have condemned the building and the use of WMD unlike all their neighbors for which they have little protection. Remember the "We are the change we've been looking for". Stop acting like Bush is good advice. How can you change something you refuse to re evaluate? I did not vote for kings or dictators but for someone to "represent" me as he 'indicated' he did. So I still expect he will.

Most Active Letters Threads

366

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
198

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
98

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
49

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation
47

Have yourself a very merry black Friday

The author of "Scroogenomics" explains why holiday shopping is a drain on the wallet and the holiday spirit

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon