This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, January 12, 2009 12:00 AM

Obama v. the National Intelligence Estimate on Iran

Last year, the NIE famously concluded with "high confidence" that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003. Why did Obama say yesterday that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons?

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, January 12, 2009 10:40 AM

    Almost correct for a change, NotOrbitBoy.

    So I will ask once again, why is William Perry worried? Why did he say what he said? (please do not provide a moronic conspiracy theory).

    Because he's smart enough to recognize there's a danger. He said nothing of a likelihood of such an attack (which is really at the low-end of probability).

    Learn to distinguish between the two concepts and you'll avoid unnecessary embarrassment.

    Obama's got to deal with the same nasty world that Bush faced. Until I see otherwise, I trust he will be prudent and do what he needs to do to maintain security (job number 1 for a US President).

    Except it isn't. The Oath of Office reads:

    "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

    Article II of the US Constitution provides the office of the President the following powers:

    1. "Be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the United States;"

    2. Grant pardons (except in cases of impeachment).

    3. Make treaties with the concurrence of 2/3rds of the Senate.

    4. Nominate and appoint (with the advice and consent of the Senate) ambassadors, other public ministers/consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States.

    5. The power to fill vacancies during recess of the Senate.

    That's it. And before you get too excited about #1, keep in mind Article I.8.14 empowers the Congress to make all rules concerning the conduct and use of the Army and Navy. All the President does there, going by the letter of the Constitution, is execute the directives of Congress.

    The fact Congress has abdicated its responsibilities there is more a reflection upon them than a reason to grant greater faith to the President. I don't dispute the world is an unstable and hostile place to US interests, but then again its always been so. Carrying on with policies that have prove counterproductive (to be polite about it) isn't that smart in such an environment.

    Then again, given its you, I shouldn't be surprised you want ot stick with what doesn't work.

Most Active Letters Threads

683

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
494

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
296

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon