This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, January 7, 2009 12:00 AM

The DOJ pursues the "real criminal" in the NSA spying scandal

While the high-level lawbreakers are protected from consequences by our political class, only the courageous whistle-blower is subject to criminal prosecution.

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, January 7, 2009 11:17 AM

    Obama's "ban"

    The transcript makes it pretty clear that his remark was in reference to the stimulus package.

    He should be able to keep track of at least that one so it's not outside the rhelm of possibility that he would veto the bill if it contains earmarks and send it back for revision.

    Still.....

    -- Jebbie

    I'm not so sure that the transcript makes it clear that he is referring only to the Stimulus package. But even so, the word "ban" is incorrect, and he must know that. Congress is free to put in as many earmarks as they wish. If Obama chooses to veto the bill that is his choice, earmarks be damned. But Congress can then send it back altered or not altered. Obama is talking out of his ass and he knows it.

Most Active Letters Threads

359

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
188

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
93

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
47

Have yourself a very merry black Friday

The author of "Scroogenomics" explains why holiday shopping is a drain on the wallet and the holiday spirit
46

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon