This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, January 7, 2009 12:00 AM

The DOJ pursues the "real criminal" in the NSA spying scandal

While the high-level lawbreakers are protected from consequences by our political class, only the courageous whistle-blower is subject to criminal prosecution.

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, January 7, 2009 08:26 AM

    BigTuna

    Old timer Garrison Keillor had something to say about that:

    Garrison Keillor on Habeas Corpus, 10/4/06

    Congress' shameful retreat from American values

    http://www.truthout.org/article/garrison-keillor-congresss-shameful-retreat-from-american-values

    This was passed by 65 senators and will now be signed by President Bush, put into effect, and in due course be thrown out by the courts.

    It's good that Barry Goldwater is dead because this would have killed him. Go back to the Senate of 1964--Goldwater, Dirksen, Russell, McCarthy, Javits, Morse, Fulbright--and you won't find more than 10 votes for it.

    None of the men and women who voted for this bill has any right to speak in public about the rule of law anymore, or to take a high moral view of the Third Reich, or to wax poetic about the American Ideal. Mark their names [...]"

    He mentions Fulbright.

    In April 1966, “Senator J. William Fulbright delivered a speech at Johns Hopkins University on “the arrogance of power.” He said, “The question I find intriguing is whether a nation so extraordinarily endowed as the United States can overcome that arrogance of power which has afflicted, weakened, and, in some cases, destroyed great nations in the past. […] No one challenges the importance of national consensus, but consensus can be understood in two ways. If it is interpreted to mean unquestioning support of existing policies, its effects can only be pernicious and undemocratic, serving to suppress differences rather than to reconcile them.”

    At the time, Senator Fulbright (D) was in the majority party, with a Democratic President (LBJ), and a war which did not loose popular support until spring of 1968. Francis Wilkinson wrote about this, and compared it to our situation in April of 2006. Towards the end of his essay [“Silence of the Lambs”], Wilkinson writes: “At the time Fulbright first tried to put the brake on war in Vietnam, the number of American dead was close to the body count from Iraq today. It took another nine years -- and more than 50,000 more U.S. dead -- before the arrogance Fulbright had identified in 1966 was exhausted.”

    Read the essay at: http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=silence_of_the_lambs

Most Active Letters Threads

417

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
188

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
110

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
55

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon