- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
Just reading your short explanation helped me understand things a lot better. Thanks, I needed that.
Wouldn’t judicial review have to include habeas corpus? [Please bear with me—total neophyte with this stuff.] They said [above]
“Liberty and security can be reconciled; and in our system they are reconciled within the framework of the law. The Framers decided that habeas corpus, a right of first importance, must be a part of that framework, a part of that law.”
Also, can the word “and” be used with a “disjucntive meaning”? And, if so, what does that mean? Ms. Hughes never talked about that in 7th grade when we were diagramming sentences.
It’s late here, so I may not be able to respond until tomorrow.
Thanks for the article karr(sic). What RMP said. Derbig, it sounds like something you would write. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jan/07/gaza-israel-palestine
bebop-o: contact Jebbie. [Thanks Jebbie :-)]
G’night, all
