This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, January 7, 2009 12:00 AM

The DOJ pursues the "real criminal" in the NSA spying scandal

While the high-level lawbreakers are protected from consequences by our political class, only the courageous whistle-blower is subject to criminal prosecution.

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, January 7, 2009 07:31 PM

    Small problem with your comment, Plum Bob.

    In calling Thomas Tamm "hero" but George Bush "law-breaker," he demonstrates that he's more interested in partisan advantage than he is in law.

    Except for the not-so-small fact that President Bush has, in fact, admitted to the nation that he did indeed authorize illegal surveillance operations. Put bluntly, he admitted he's a law breaker; the fact he has (thus far) escaped prosecution for this doesn't negate the fact.

    As for Mr. Tamm, we can debate his heroism all we want. Ultimately the fact he chose to follow a set of convictions which for him transcended the bureaucratic structure that employed him sets him apart from many of his fellows. I don't know if that makes him a 'hero', but certainly speaks to his bravery.

    Then again, I once heard "a hero is someone who is too scared not to be a coward".

    The law is the law.

    So was slavery in most of the United States prior to January 1, 1863. So were the Poll Tests used throughout the southern US until after 1965.

    Just saying.

    Apply the letter universally, or not at all.

    So say we all.

Most Active Letters Threads

490

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
227

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon