Read other letters about this article
Speaking of examples of "dishonest" rhetoric:
Hewitt always has substantive discussions on his program. However, I would be floored if Greenwald actually engaged in a substantive discussion. He is one of the most dishonest writers on the left, which is really saying something.
When you make an assertion, you should provide evidence to back it up. As I just did. That's what makes for "substantive discussion".
Cheers,
Note: The gist of my comment will either be lost on -- or ignored by -- Groaner here.