Read other letters about this article
Natan Sharansky would be polite to him too.
Sharansky was so polite to his Russian guards, they came to respect and love him for his honest willingness to debate with them and to treat them as fellow human beings.
Today, in the WSJ, Sharansky details exactly what is going on here in the anti-Israel propaganda campaign. The article is entitled "How the U.N. Perpetuates the 'Refugee' Problem"
Keep up the bad work, you stoopid, leftoid bigots.
I still do not understand why Glenda is so lacking in balls, he will not agree to reciprocate, and test his own 'progressive' mettle against his 'right wing' counterparts.
GWEN:
Why not start a regular debate here, inviting the following opponents to your suecidal beliefs to exchange opinions and perspectives with your I think utterly lame beliefs:
1. Tomorrow and every Wednesday you could exchange ideas and debate Natan Sharansky.
2. Thursdays you could run circles around Charles Krauthammer (or would you be afraid of a grown man in a wheel chair?).
3. Fridays you could lay waste to Canada's wonderful Marc Steyn.
4. We'll give you both of the Sabbath days off, Gwen, to help you recover from the spanking of three very bad days for your knee jerk, liberal, oblivious thought.
5. Monday you can have someone easy: How about Michelle Malkin? Do you think you'd score well with her?
6. How about Michael Savage on Tuesdays. He'd be real nice to you, I'm sure.
7. Wednesdays? How about me. I bet you think you've easily bested me on your own, self absorbed site. Let's go for it, Gwen. I could easily take you to the wood pile as a self hating Jew who is determined to remain clueless in your devotion to "progressive" suecidalism.