This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, January 5, 2009 12:00 AM

Obama's impressive new OLC chief

A law professor with a history of strident condemnation of Bush radicalism is named to one of the most important positions in the executive branch.

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, January 6, 2009 09:44 AM

    E-MAIL FEINSTEIN IF YOU'RE FROM CALIFORNIA

    We need to strongly support Obama on his decision to nominate Leon Panetta as the new CIA director. If you live in California, I strongly suggest that you e-mail Feinstein expressing your dismay with her non-support of Panetta. Here's my e-mail:

    January 6, 2009

    VIA E-MAIL ONLY

    Senator Dianne Feinstein

    Washington, DC

    Dear Senator Feinstein:

    I am deeply dismayed and shocked by your non-support of President Elect Obama on his selection of Leon Panetta as the next director of the CIA.

    First, and foremost, most of the “intelligence professionals” that you cite as a preferred alternative have been tainted by the last eight years of lawlessness and torture by the worst administration in history, the Bush Administration. Barack Obama wisely chose someone outside of the intelligence services precisely because that person is not tainted by the illegal wiretapping and torture scandals of Bush and Cheney.

    Second, Leon Panetta is an outstanding public servant, having served as a congressman from nearby Monterey County, and later, as President Clinton’s chief of staff. He is an excellent choice for the position, despite his ‘lack’ of intelligence experience. He is no one’s crony, at least in the intelligence community, and that is a GOOD thing, not a bad thing!

    Third, Barack Obama wants to reshape the intelligence gathering for this nation in a way that will both benefit our safety and that will restore the respect that this nation once garnered for its handling of world-wide affairs.

    I strongly suspect that you are more concerned with your own potential liability as a “gang-of-eight” member who has been briefed on Bush’s illegal activities, than you are concerned with the future of this nation.

    Sincerely,

    farbie

    Belmont, California

    cc: Senators Reid and Rockefeller

Most Active Letters Threads

682

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
326

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
274

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon