This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, January 5, 2009 12:00 AM

Obama's impressive new OLC chief

A law professor with a history of strident condemnation of Bush radicalism is named to one of the most important positions in the executive branch.

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, January 5, 2009 01:01 PM

    There will be no transparancy

    until Executive Order 13233 is rescinded, to remove impediments to access to historical presidential records. See: Transparency Groups Push Obama on Agenda, November 12, 2008

    http://www.propublica.org/article/transparency-groups-push-obama-on-agenda-1112

    Executive Order 13233 - Further Implementation of the Presidential Records Act, November 1, 2001.

    http://www.archives.gov/about/laws/appendix/13233.html

    This order allows a former president's private papers to be released only with the approval of both that former president (or his heirs) and the current one.

    Enacting Executive Order 13233 was not the first time Bush and White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales had resisted clear law about Freedom of Information in Government. It had also occurred as then-Governor Bush was leaving office in Texas, when 1,800 boxes of papers became “the center of a tug of war between Mr. Bush and the director of the Texas state archives.” The Governor kept these papers out of reach by placing them in his father’s Presidential Library. [See: “Battling Over Records of Bush's Governorship” NYT, 2/11/2002] http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9906E7D8103CF932A25751C0A9649C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=print

    The Bush Administration had to get Executive Order 13233 written and signed quickly because President Reagan’s papers were about to be released because of the PRA [his were the first, since the law was enacted in 1981] Cheney, Rumsfeld and GHW Bush had all been in that [Iran-Contra] Administration. Bush and the Cheney-gang made three attempts to withhold those records before they “decided” to take the “executive privilege” tack. See: “Bush keeps a grip on Presidential Papers” NYT:] http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9801E0D71130F931A35752C1A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&page

    A Controversial Choice for the Position of Archivist of the United States: Part of the Bush Administration's Secrecy Strategy?, by John W. Dean, 4/23/04 http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20040423.html

    Unfortunately, while George Bush understands tough talk, it seems the Democrats don't. Thus, Bush and Cheney will no doubt get away with robbing history of the truth of their presidency, just as they have robbed the public of that truth while in office.

Most Active Letters Threads

688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
647

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
322

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
209

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon