From the Boston Herald link:
"These individuals bring the integrity, depth of experience and tenacity that the Department of Justice demands in these uncertain times. I have the fullest confidence that they will ensure that the Department of Justice once again fulfills its highest purpose: to uphold the Constitution and protect the American people. I look forward to working with them in the months and years ahead," Obama said in a statement.
When Obama describes DOJ's "highest purpose", he starts off wonderfully by saying these appointees will "uphold the Constitution". But that second part brought me up short. Should I be concerned about the "protect the American people" part?
I realize that normally, one would just impute this to the function of prosecution of those accused of violating Federal law, and although that is "protecting us", I think of protection as coming more from DOD. However, with the "protecting us from the terrists" excuse the Bushies used for the very Constitutional violations Johnsen rails against, this one disturbs me.
I hope that my caution here turns out to be misguided.
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
219 Democrats and one Republican join in favor of the legislation, which passed by a narrow margin
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Salon headlines in your mailbox