This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, January 5, 2009 12:00 AM

Obama's impressive new OLC chief

A law professor with a history of strident condemnation of Bush radicalism is named to one of the most important positions in the executive branch.

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, January 6, 2009 11:24 PM

    @Arne Langsetmo

    Your points are well taken as to DO officers serving as DCIA. But here again

    you and Glenn seem to think that one of the most critical intel jobs in

    the nation can only be filled by either a political emissary or someone from the

    DO. Which of course just doesn't have to be the case, and was my point

    in the last post. I mean with what is on the horizon concerning Afghanistan,

    Pakistan and Iran and Iraq, are you telling me you want Leon Panetta

    at the controls playing catch up, you can't be serious!

    Tim Weiner's "Legacy of Ashes" is brilliant in places, but seriously biased and

    disingenuous in others. Steve Coll's "Ghost Wars" is vintage Coll and brilliant

    as always. Hindsight is always 20/20. I operated in Afghanistan from 1987-89.

    Let me assure you that from the NGO's in Peshawar, to the Agency, to the Pakis,

    to the USAF pilots that were flying into Kandahar. Yes, the USAF was directly involved

    in the war against the Soviets. We all thought we were doing the right thing in

    supporting the Hezbi, Jamiat, Massoud and others. Could the radicalization of these

    groups have been predicted, at that time it was a coin toss at best. That was

    something that occurred much later in the arena. If you doubt this then look at the

    seldom mentioned fact that there were no suicide bombings against the Soviets.

    And later none by the Taliban against the Northern Alliance. As for the holes in

    "Legacy of Ashes" good analysis is given at:

    http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/03/20/twist_the_evidence_win_a_prize/

    http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docid=hsnews-000002688704

    I think it's also important to remember that most journalists are analyst at best. In

    other words, they don't actually do the jobs they write about. Which, does not

    disqualify their opinions, but doing and analyzing are two very different things,

    as Strobe Talbott quickly found out.

Most Active Letters Threads

682

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
341

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
276

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon