Read other letters about this article
Your points are well taken as to DO officers serving as DCIA. But here again
you and Glenn seem to think that one of the most critical intel jobs in
the nation can only be filled by either a political emissary or someone from the
DO. Which of course just doesn't have to be the case, and was my point
in the last post. I mean with what is on the horizon concerning Afghanistan,
Pakistan and Iran and Iraq, are you telling me you want Leon Panetta
at the controls playing catch up, you can't be serious!
Tim Weiner's "Legacy of Ashes" is brilliant in places, but seriously biased and
disingenuous in others. Steve Coll's "Ghost Wars" is vintage Coll and brilliant
as always. Hindsight is always 20/20. I operated in Afghanistan from 1987-89.
Let me assure you that from the NGO's in Peshawar, to the Agency, to the Pakis,
to the USAF pilots that were flying into Kandahar. Yes, the USAF was directly involved
in the war against the Soviets. We all thought we were doing the right thing in
supporting the Hezbi, Jamiat, Massoud and others. Could the radicalization of these
groups have been predicted, at that time it was a coin toss at best. That was
something that occurred much later in the arena. If you doubt this then look at the
seldom mentioned fact that there were no suicide bombings against the Soviets.
And later none by the Taliban against the Northern Alliance. As for the holes in
"Legacy of Ashes" good analysis is given at:
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/03/20/twist_the_evidence_win_a_prize/
http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docid=hsnews-000002688704
I think it's also important to remember that most journalists are analyst at best. In
other words, they don't actually do the jobs they write about. Which, does not
disqualify their opinions, but doing and analyzing are two very different things,
as Strobe Talbott quickly found out.